Yesterdays going at warwick published as soft.
The first race ran approx 2.5 furlongs slower than average (heavy
by my thinking), by the third race it was changed to heavy.
running in excess of 4.5 furlongs slower than average, I would have
described the going as bottomless.
Cheltenham going is described as soft/ good to soft in places
being only about 40 miles from warwick, I would have my doubts about
the going description.
perhaps anyone in the cheltenham area would care to put up what the
weather conditions have been like in the area.